  |
|
 |
COMM
Professional Portfolio Evaluation Procedures
COMM Class
of 2012 Portfolio Mentors &
Evaluators
Evaluation Procedures:
-
By the end of November 2010 (or earlier as
determined), each student COMM major will be expected to obtain a review of his/her portfolio with
his/her COMM faculty mentor.
Take his/her advice!!
-
By
Wednesday,
February 1, 2012,
each senior portfolio must be ready for evaluation by the two assigned COMM faculty members. The evaluation will be guided by the
COMM portfolio
Evaluation Rubric
and will use a 5 point scale.
Links to the evaluation rubric is found here and below. Use those
evaluation criteria as you write and edit your reflection
statements.
-
Evaluation will NOT involve "re-grading" artifacts but will, rather,
focus primarily on the students' understanding of how goals have been
met and
demonstrated in the artifacts as revealed in reflection
statements.
-
Once
each faculty evaluator has scored each goal (i.e. I., II., etc..) for
a portfolio, the two evaluators will meet to discuss their scores and
reach a "consensus" score for each goal. These scores will determine the
portfolio grade and will be recorded for assessment purposes. The
evaluators will also prepare comments to accompany the scores as
feedback to the student.
-
An
acceptable portfolio will achieve a 3.0 or better average score
and no more than one
score less than 3.0 on any specific goal (e.g. I., II. III., IV) in each category.
-
Results
of portfolio evaluations will be available to students by
February
29 or
before. Should a student's portfolio receive less than a passing
score, that student will have
until March 21 to make revisions and
correct deficiencies at which time the evaluators will review the
portfolio for a second time.
Normally the department will not
review a portfolio more than twice in a single semester.
Students who do not pass
the portfolio on the second attempt can expect to register for and
repeat COMM 421 at a later time.
Evaluation Rubric
last updated 9/25/2011
|