|
Objections
to data/evidence -
What's wrong with the
"proof" a persuader may be offering?
(1)
insufficient
evidence
(2)
irrelevant
evidence
(3)
suppressed
evidence
(4)
unreliable
source
(5)
biased
source
(6)
unrepresentative
sample
(7)
lack
of proportion (no baseline)
(8)
atypical
example
Forewarned is
forearmed? (AP 38)
-
Even
though ads are obvious persuasion efforts and people say they are not much
effected -- the fact is they seem to work
-
Children
under 8 have little resistance (weak on counter-arguments -- but the soon
become cynics (88% don't trust ads by age 12)
-
Ads
work among the more sophisticated because of peripheral route issues -
"heavily advertised goods must sell a lot and be good"
-
Forewarning
often only makes subjects wish to appear unpersuaded.
-
Forewarning
often appears to help immediately after message but then the FW effect wears
off in a week or so.
-
Forewarning
doesn't provide a defense if subjects see the message issue as unimportant.
-
It
does work if the subjects are willing to think about rebutting the message
-
OR,
esp. if the audience is "inoculated" and given practice in rebuttal.
-
Inoculation
works best when "cultural truisms" are attacked (because we seldom
consider why we believe these things and so don't have ready counter-arguments.)
Stop
Propaganda! (AP 39)
-
Recognize you too can be a victim of
illegitimate persuasion (“gotcha”)
-
Monitor your emotions when receiving
persuasive messages
-
Focus on the motivation and credibility of
the persuader
-
Take pride in being rational. Mindless receivers are dupes.
-
Consider your full range of options, not
just what the persuader offers
-
Judge agents by outcomes not promises
-
Be aware of the prevalence of “Factoids”
-
Beware of the bandwagon. Repetition and popularity are not proxies
for truth.
-
If is seems too good to be true, it
probably is.
-
Always think about counter arguments.
-
Use multiple sources for information (and
remember, the mainstream press may be a single source)
-
Recognize the essentials of democratic
systems
·
decentralized
communication systems – multiple sources
·
power
is constrained by checks and balances
·
goals
and agenda are set by discussion not leader fiat
·
reciprocity
of influence between citizens and leaders
·
flexible
social structures and roles
·
minority
opinion is encouraged
|