VOLUNTEER INCOME TAX ASSISTANCE

YEAR 2008 TAXPAYER SATISFACTION SURVEY

 

235 taxpayers completed the survey (222 answered question 1 and 233 answered question 5).

 

On a scale of 1 – 5 (1 = very dissatisfied, 5 = very satisfied), rate the following items:

 

 

ITEM

1

2

3

4

5

2008

Wghtd.

Avg.

2007

Wghtd.

Avg.

2006

Wghtd. Avg.

2005

Wghtd.

Avg.

2004

Wghtd.

Avg.

1

Amount of time you had to wait.

.4%

1 person

1.4%

3 people

11.3%

25 people

14.4%

32 people

72.5%

161 people

4.57

4.55

4.61

4.42

4.56

2

Privacy during your

meeting.

.4%

1 person

.9%

2 people

6.4%

15 people

15.3%

36 people

77.0%

181 people

4.68

4.59

4.66

4.60

4.63

3

Ability of the volunteer to provide the assistance needed within the parameters of the VITA program.

 

 

3.8%

9 people

 

9.4%

22 people

86.8%

204 people

4.83

4.82

4.89

4.75

4.79

4

Courtesy of the volunteer who helped you.

 

 

.9%

2 people

5.1%

12 people

94.0%

221 people

4.93

4.94

4.97

4.91

4.94

5

Once the return was completed, the volunteer explained the entries on the return.

 

.4%

1 person

1.7%

4 people

  5.1%

12 people

92.8%

218 people

4.90

4.94

4.92

4.88

N/A

(Question not on survey in 2004)

6

Explanation of what

you need to do next.

 

.4%

1 person

2.6%

6 people

5.6%

13 people

91.4%

213 people

4.88

4.86

4.92

4.85

4.78

7

Overall satisfaction with service (considering all items).

 

 

1.7%

4 people

7.7%

18 people

90.6%

213 people

4.89

4.90

4.93

4.84

4.86

FACULTY COMMENTS CONCERNING THE ABOVE SURVEY RESULTS:

The two items that continue to score lower than the others deal with waiting time and privacy.  The constraints for both these items are equipment and suitability of space.  We have attempted to resolve the waiting time the past four years by providing more sessions in the first two busy weeks.  However, we opened a new site in Galesburg last year, and as expected, it continues to be quite busy.  Once again, the program grew over last year (9% in prepared returns, 14% in e-filed returns) and the number of students increased (23 students this year compared to 20 last year).  We continue to work well within our constraints of equipment and space, as our constituents appear to be satisfied overall with our service (100% answering 3 or above and a weighted average score of 4.89 out of 5).  We are excited about the breakout rooms planned in the new business building that will better serve our constituents. 


 

Other:

 

Some taxpayers did not turn the survey over to answer the following questions on the back.  Also, on the first two questions, the taxpayer could give more than one answer.

 

 

Return Preparation

Electronic Filing

Tax Advice

Other

 

 

 

 

Why did you visit this site?

138 hits

117 hits

17hits

17 hits

 

 

 

 

 

IRS

Previous use of this site

Poster

Newspaper

TV/Radio

Word of mouth

MC

VITA

Website

Other

How did you find out about this site?

7 hits

65 hits

5 hits

31 hits

9 hits

83hits

30 hits

26 hits

 

Yourself

Paid tax professional

Friend or relative

Other

Not applicable

 

 

 

If we had not helped you today, who would have prepared your return?

20.9%

46 people

48.2%

106 people

18.2%

40 people

9.1%

20 people

36%

8 people

 

 

 

 

YES

NO

 

 

 

 

 

 

Would you use this service again?

100%

216 people

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

YES

NO

 

 

 

 

 

 

Would you recommend this service to a friend needing tax assistance?

100%

215 people

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Under 25

25 – 39

40-59

60-65

Over 65

 

 

 

What is your age?

22.5%

50 people

16.7%

37 people

35.1%

78 people

9.5%

21 people

16.2%

36 people

 

 

 

 

Less than $32,000

$32,000 or more

 

 

 

 

 

 

What is your household income?

73.8%

158 people

26.2%

56 people

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FACULTY COMMENTS CONCERNING THE ABOVE SURVEY RESULTS:

We are quite pleased with the 100% for BOTH “would you use this service again?” and “would you recommend this service to a friend needing tax assistance?”  We have never received below 100% for these two items.

 

Word of mouth was added to the survey for the first time in 2006; it is the most popular way for people to find out about the program.  Otherwise, it’s previous use of the site, MC website, and the newspaper.  Also, the Galesburg Library does some of its own advertising (for example, through its newsletter).  Some of the other ways in which people found out about the program that they wrote on the survey:  senior care center, parent, went to school here.


 

The rest of the survey provides interesting information.  The majority of our constituents earn less than $32,000, and those folks are the ones we are trying to target.  The age categories are similar to last year, although the 40-59 had increased last year from the prior year. 

 

Written comments from the surveys:

 

What suggestions or comments do you have about how we can better serve you?