SOME WRITING AND REVIEW GUIDELINES

Use the following format to provide all bibliographic information at top of review:

For articles in journals--

Last Name of Author, First Name. "Title of Article."Journal or Book Title Italicized or Underlined Vol No. (Date of Publication), Pages. Number of illustrations.

For books--

Last Name of Author, First Name. Book Title Italicized or Underlined. Place of Publication: Publisher, Date of Publication. Number of illustrations.

For websites--
Last Name of Author, First Name. Title of Website. URL. Date of access (not required).
Note: If you cannot identify the author(s) of the website you should not use this source.

Your review should contain the following:
1.) a summary of the author's main points;
2.) a list of the sources and materials which the author used to make this point;
3.) your evaluation of the author's argument.

These three features should be integrated together into your review rather than be treated separately.

Early in the review you should state clearly and succinctly what the author's main point is. In the body of the review you should summarize this point and evaluate it. Accompany both summary and evaluation with discussion of the kinds of evidence the author uses to make this point. In classical papers, this evidence can include not only ancient materials like artwork, archaeological finds, and literary materials, but also modern scholarship. If you make reference to particular pieces of evidence, be sure you provide your reader with enough bibliographic information to find this evidence through a standard library or electronic search.

Your evaluation should focus on the author's main point rather than on the way the author makes this point. Your review should avoid words like "boring," "uninteresting," etc. You may criticize in passing the author's writing style but you should highlight the (in)effectiveness of the author's argumentation rather than the author's style of presentation. Do you think that the author has proven the point of the article? Why or why not?

Refer to the author by name rather than to the article. Don't write "The article states...." Instead write "In this article NAME OF AUTHOR states..."

If the piece is illustrated, be sure to discuss the illustrations. What kind objects are illustrated? What kind of illustrations (color, black-and-white, photographs or figures)? How do these illustrations relate to the author's point?

Be sure you use correct spelling and grammar.

Avoid addressing the reader as "you." Assume that you are writing for a general reader who knows nothing about this topic and who needs everything explained.

This material has been published on the web by Prof. Tom Sienkewicz for his students at Monmouth College. If you have any questions, you can contact him at toms@monm.edu.

Return to Monmouth College Department of Classics Homepage