[34a] PART TWO

 

                                      A detailed and truthful account

                                     of those events and occurrences

                              which took place in the years 1562‑1577,

                                       after the eclipse of the Order,

                    during the reign of Sigismund Augustus II in Livonia,

                           and in the interregnum following his demise.

 

 

          The Livonians had now become vassals of the King of Poland in the manner described above in Part One and when one allies oneself with a new sovereign and wishes to avoid offending him, one must give thought and consideration to a number of things, in this instance to the old and new treaties binding the Livonians to the King of Poland, their closest sovereign and Christian neighbor, and especially to that eternal and unconditional alliance against the Muscovite which the legates of the Holy Roman Empire concluded with the King of Poland at Pozvol, as mentioned above, after he broke off his campaign against Livonia. They could, moreover, expect greater and more ready assistance from him, in both winter and summer, by reason of the proximity of the two countries, and thus better insure the defense of their ancestral lands which bordered on Russia.[1]

 

          Up to now His Majesty had been able to maintain peaceful relations with the raging enemy everywhere except in Livonia, but now he drew the bloody and mighty war away from the Livonians upon his own ancestral lands, as can be seen from the Russian's following declaration of hostilities and from His Majesty's reply.

 

                                    [34b] A Declaration of Hostilities

                   from the Grand Duke of Moscow to the King of Poland

 

          We, born Ivan Vasilovich, one of God's ordained governors of His kingdom and mighty emperor of all Russia, of the lands of Moscow, Novgorod (Newgarden), Kazan and Astrakhan, prince and heir, ever ascendant lord and conqueror, master of the province and country of Livonia, hereby declare to you, Sigismund Augustus, present King of Poland, with this our public letter, our displeasure, anger and eternal hostility. Up to now we, and our now departed father during his own lifetime, considered you a good neighbor, something of which you were never deserving. We are much amazed that you dared attempt to seize the worthless and abject country of Livonia, giving no heed to our indescribably great might which will make it impossible for you and your allies to achieve your goal. We now declare that we intend to attack you, Sigismund, and all your allies with all the forces at our disposal, with fire, arrows, sabers and mighty artillery. Nor will you yourself and your vassals be anywhere safe and secure in your own country and thus will you be made aware of our displeasure and anger. We furthermore declare to you with this our letter that we intend to beset all your lands with an invincible army, burning, plundering and devastating. And we will take along with us a coffin and shed blood until I in my might bring it to pass that either my own head or yours shall be placed in it. You and your subjects prepare yourselves accordingly. Proclaimed in our imperial city of Moscow.

 

                                    [35a] The King of Poland's Reply

                          to the Grand Duke's Declaration of Hostilities

 

          Sigismund Augustus, King in Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuanians, Russians, Prussians, Masovians, Samogithians, lord and heir of the lands of Smolensk and Livonia, etc. Since you, born Grand Duke of the White and Red Russians, have publicly sent us and our kingdom your declaration of hostilities in which you direly threaten us, renounce all love and friendship from now through all eternity, and do all you can to insure that we will live and act in mutual enmity (all this according to your own letter), we proclaim in reply that we likewise intend to beset your vassals and subjects with fire, arson, artillery and all other weapons and instruments of war and to plunder, devastate and destroy your land. Furthermore, we intend to put you to flight and pursue you relentlessly throughout your entire country. In your declaration of hostilities you proclaimed you would bring a coffin along with you and your mighty assembled army and that you would not cease slaying and shedding blood until either our head or yours was placed in said coffin. In response to that I announce to you that we, along with all the forces at our disposal and the help of God, intend to make our stand at Smolensk where, during the time of our blessed father and your forefathers, almost 300,000 men fought, died and won the battle with the help of God. It is here that we likewise plan to attack, here and along the other borders of your country. And so we call upon you, in the name of your God whose governor you claim to be, to make ready and appear there in person along with your men. There our two sides shall do battle and we will see whom God and Fortune favor. You, your subjects and allies, prepare accordingly. Make ready to defend yourselves against me. [2]

 

          [35b] Now while the Muscovite was occupied with the King of Poland's lands in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, the Livonians could have rallied and recovered somewhat had not King Erik of Sweden once again and doubtlessly for the reasons mentioned above made threatening moves, and these even more serious than those he had earlier made against Reval and Padis. This was in spite of the fact that the King of Poland did everything he could, through dispatched delegations and other means, to dissuade King Erik, as a young lord who had only recently ascended the throne, from such undertakings and to move him to more peaceful behavior which would guarantee the security and prosperity of the poor Christians of these regions. But all one saw from King Erik were hostile designs: soon hereafter he invested the city of Pernau with an army around Whitsuntide, bombarded and stormed it, and in June captured it and forced it to surrender. Those people had placed their trust in the armistice and thus they had failed to provide the city with a sufficient garrison or means of defense.[3]

 

          The following fall he also threatened the castle of Weissenstein which the Muscovite had earlier besieged for several months but where he had broken off the siege after suffering heavy losses. Now, slashing at a fresh wound, as one says, the Swedes bombarded and stormed that castle, but they were unable to achieve anything on account of the brave and bold defenders and so they abandoned the siege. Finally, however, they invested the castle's approaches and cut off the defenders' supplies and starvation forced them to surrender.[4]

 

          To prevent the Swedish forces from gaining similar success at Sonnenburg on Ösel, the Duke of Courland admitted to that castle a few of Duke Magnus' men who, if need arose, were to announce that they were Danish subjects and thereby dissuade the Swedes from attacking. This was done according to a detailed, written stipulation, the original of which is still extant, that should this no longer be necessary then the persons installed in the castle would be withdrawn without any prejudice to the Duke of Courland or to the lord advocate, Heinrich von Lüninckhausen, surnamed Wulff, who as a former official of the Order also had an interest in the matter.[5] The summary of the above‑mentioned

stipulation reads as follows:

 

          These measures to meet the emergency shall in no way prejudice or negate the rightful claim of the master and his direct descendants, regardless of any other changes which might occur, to this castle and its district. Rather, we commit ourselves to withdraw our officers and men regardless of whether the above‑mentioned plan gains its desired outcome or not. And all those who are in the castle's garrison, aside from our own men, shall remain subject and bound as before to you, your descendants and to the lord advocate. Thus these measures designed to meet the emergency and agreed to by us both shall in no way whatsoever, now or in the future, result in any prejudice or loss to you or your family. We do this all in good Christian faith, without design or evil intent. We, Magnus, have had our seal affixed to this document. Proclaimed and recorded in Riga, January 29, in the year of our dear Savior Christ, 1562.

 

                                                                                   (Magnus' own signature)

 

          As mentioned above, the King of Denmark had been receptive to the exchange of the reorganized diocese of Courland for Sonnenburg when he spoke with the young Achaz von Zehman and also when he wrote a separate letter to the Duke of Courland. He had also dispatched his worthy legates, Dietrich Behr, Sir Gerloff Troll (knight) and Dr. Koppern to Hasenpoten in Courland. The Duke joined them there hoping the exchange could be brought to its desired conclusion.

 

          [36b] But Duke Magnus, influenced by evil counsellors[6] absolutely refused and so the legates had to break off the negotiations. Yet at this time the King of Poland was planning to send a legate, Sir Heinrich von Dohna,[7] to the Kingdom of Denmark to discuss other more weighty matters, namely, a confederation and alliance against King Erik of Sweden. And so the Danish legates and the Duke of Courland wrote down, recorded and signed an agreement whereby the terms of the transfer were to remain the same in the meanwhile and the matter was to rest until one might determine the outcome of the major negotiations having to do with the confederation. The matter of the diocese and Sonnenburg was a subordinate, dependant issue and might well be settled upon ratification of the alliance.

 

          Toward fall Duke Johan of Finland, the present King of Sweden, arrived in Kaunas (Cawen) in Lithuania where he was betrothed to Lady Catherine, the sister of His Royal Majesty, Sigismund Augustus, King of Poland. The wedding was then celebrated and consummated in Vilna.[8]

 

          After the wedding the duke and his illustrious and noble wife, Lady Catherine, born of the royal Polish line, journeyed home[9] by way of Livonia. He was received on the Düna, not far from Riga, by the Duke of Courland, the royal governor and viceroy, and taken to his lodgings. Toward evening and during their long night of love there was such heavy fog that the people on the River Düna moved here and there, back and forth, hopelessly lost and disoriented. This was an evil omen of future troubles for the Duke of Finland and his wife. Then, a few days later during their departure, they became icebound in the Düna and could travel no farther by water. The royal governor had them taken to Pernau [37a] with his own coaches, wagons, horses and other necessary equipment, along with some noblemen of the district. Had the Duke and his wife not departed immediately after their arrival at Pernau, they would have enjoyed the same hospitality from the soldiers of that city which was later extended to the coachmen and drivers and to others even today: they slew a number of them and took the wagons and horses.

 

          The King of Poland's treasury was at this time so depleted on account of the war[10] that it would have been extremely difficult for him to have given his son‑in‑law, the Duke of Finland, dowry money. Instead the king received several thousand thalers from the duke and then both amounts were combined and the king mortgaged six castles in Livonia to him.[11] As soon as actual possession was transferred, an illicit count[12], Johann von Artz, was appointed governor, administrator and magistrate.

 

          When von Artz learned what later happened to his lord in Finland at Turku (King Erik besieged and bombarded his brother and his wife in the castle, took them prisoner, brought them to Stockholm, and placed them in lengthy confinement),[13] he seized this opportunity and conspired with the Muscovite, the Grand Duke.[14] If the latter would grant him one of those mortgaged castles, Helmede, as his own hereditary fief, and defend it as such, then he would transfer the other five to him and place them in his hands.

 

          The Grand Duke did not long delay, but rather dispatched soldiers to implement the plan. While one group of soldiers was allowed to enter Trikaten with the count, the other group was driven off with artillery fire. Thus the would‑be count was taken prisoner by the Germans at Trikaten and brought to the Duke of Courland, the royal governor, in Riga. After a trial was held, he was first punished by being torn with glowing tongs and then he and two or three [37b] of his cohorts were placed on the wheel.[15] Many an upstanding man learned from him how sweet life is, for in order to save and preserve his own he offered to spend the rest of his life bound on an iron chain, lying like a dog outside the stables, subsisting on nothing but bread and water. But such a boon was not granted him.[16]

 

          Thus did the six mortgaged castles return to the hands and control of the King of Poland and this and other issues connected with them later led to great disputes between the two kingdoms.

 

          Up to now Livonia offered spoil aplenty for her neighbors. The country was regarded as something derelict and abandoned, a hay stack from which almost everyone plucked or pulled something.[17] It was indeed the apple of Eris[18] and the gold of Toulouse[19] and everyone who tried to seize some of it had almost all their fingers smartly burned. First, almost all the estates of the archdiocese and the Order lost their lands and status as a result of their needless, internal wars. Prussia and Mecklenburg gained nothing when they intervened on behalf of their captive and imprisoned brothers, the blessed lord archbishop and Duke Christopher. The King of Poland lost Polozk, no insignificant part of his ancestral lands.[20] Finland also experienced losses. The extremely destructive Danish, Swedish and Lübeck war, fought at sea and on land, originated in part over Livonia, and especially over Duke Magnus' diocese. Finally even the Muscovite himself had to pay up, having to cede and abandon everything he had held in that country, while also losing many splendid fortresses, lands and subjects in Russia and Korela (Carelen) to which the King of Sweden now rightfully lays claim. In summation, there is no doubt but that if all the above‑mentioned potentates had joined their forces and resources and launched them against the Turk, they would, with God's help, have inflicted a great defeat upon him.

 

                                               [38a] The year 1563

 

          On February 15 the Russian conquered the mighty mercantile city of Polozk, just when the Lithuanians least expected it, having gathered at Petrikov for a reichstag with the Poles.[21] That he did not move on Vilna after winning this victory, capture it and ravage across the entire country as he could have done was due to the following hope which they held out to him and which functioned as a ruse. For one must oppose the enemy as one opposes a wolf, either by a direct course or an oblique course.[22] They announced that the estates of the royal Grand Duchy of Lithuania had gathered in Petrikov for the main purpose of electing a successor to the present king, since he was without heirs.[23] They said they would just as soon have the Muscovite or one of his sons be their king and grand duke as anyone else. He believed this and went back to Moscow with his prisoners and mighty spoils.

 

          When great despondency arose in Livonia on account of the loss and capture of Polozk, several people issued a reassuring statement, saying that one should not be disheartened on that account. That they had merely lost a wooden city which could be retaken just as easily as it had been captured by the Muscovite.[24] Afterwards the King of Poland, Stephen, had occasion to test the truth of that statement: his entire army and the great valor of his soldiers were sorely tested before he was able to recapture the city and castle and bring them under his control.[25]

 

          At the same time that Polozk was lost the blessed bishop of Riga, Margrave Wilhelm, passed away on February 4, on the Thursday after Candlemas, at five o'clock at night. On August 25 he was interred in the cathedral church in the presence of legates from the King of Poland [38b], the Duke of Prussia, the Duke of Courland, as well as the knights and the estates.[26]

 

          Later the Lithuanian estates went with their forces to a new fortress they had recently built by the name of Vla. Here they encountered the Muscovite's commander‑in‑chief, Knez Peter Sitski (Susski), a man reputed to be the Grand Duke of Moscow's most worthy and skilled military commander. But they defeated and routed him and his forces in open battle. Sir Nicholas Radzivil, the Duke of Birse, etc., and Lithuanian commander‑in‑chief, an exemplary, intelligent and experienced man, directed the entire campaign with great skill and splendid judgment and with the mighty victory he achieved he far surpassed the above‑mentioned Knez Peter and proved to be his master.[27]

 

          King Erik was now involved in plans regarding the city of Riga which he hoped to persuade to follow the example of Reval and which he was also preparing to attack. He had already brought his heavy artillery, accompanied by the Frenchman Charles de Morney[28] into the archdiocese, but all this was under the pretext of coming to the assistance of the coadjutor of the archdiocese, Duke Christopher of Mecklenburg, whom he had just recently summoned to Sweden from Germany.[29] But Almighty God brought it about that the King of Poland assembled a mighty army of German horsemen and foot soldiers under the command of Ernst Weyer at Kaunas. These forces were dispatched to Livonia and thus the cooperation and armed readiness of the two illustrious Christian kings of Poland and Denmark presented King Erik with a stumbling block, one which stopped him and impeded his progress.[30]

 

          His Royal Majesty, along with the Duke of Prussia,[31] the Duke of Courland, and Achaz von Zehman,[32] the palatine of Marienburg, were present in person at the mustering of the German forces at Kaunas.[33] His Royal Majesty there appointed the Duke of Courland commander‑in‑chief. The king also graciously assisted in the negotiations between [39a] him and the old Duke of Prussia regarding his marriage to the Mecklenburg princess, the present Duchess of Courland.[34]

 

          The above‑mentioned Duke Christopher remained in the splendid fortress of Treiden in his part of the diocese, that around Lemsal, after the withdrawal of the Swedish forces. When he learned of the arrival in Semgallia of the German forces which had been mustered at Kaunas, he not only sent his men to Dolen (Dalen) on the Düna to reconnoiter, but also quickly followed after them himself. He was attacked and besieged at Dolen on July 31 and surrendered to the commander‑in‑chief, the Duke of Courland, three days later. From there he was taken to the castle at Riga and then, at the request and command of the King of Poland, he was turned over to several Lithuanians at the border. From there he was taken to Poland where he was imprisoned for six years.

 

          On August 7 Swedish forces surprised and captured Karx (Kerckhaus), one of the castles mortgaged to the Duke of Finland. They had also besieged, bombarded and captured Hapsal on July 28.[35]

 

          At this time the Swedish commander, Ake Bengtsson (Bensen),[36] was in Wiek with his army, bombarding the castle of Lode which belonged to Duke Magnus. And so the Livonian commander‑in‑chief did not delay for long but rather advanced on the above‑mentioned places in Wiek (although he did not do this until the fall), hoping to try his luck against the Swedes. When Ake Bengtsson learned that these unwelcome guests were suddenly descending upon him, he abandoned the siege of Lode and spiked a number of his heavy artillery pieces which he was unable to take with him to Reval. And so the castle of Lode was rescued from the Swedish siege on September 30 and some heavy artillery pieces, "monks," "hounds", and "singers", which the Swedes had been unable to spike, came under the control of the Duke of Courland. It was only with the greatest of difficulty that he was able to transport them over the totally wretched and dreadful road from there to Riga.[37]

 

          [39b] On October 5 these forces also captured Leal, which the commander‑in‑chief, the Duke of Courland, then turned over to the junkers of Wiek who had been driven from their lands. They did not hold it against the Swedish forces for very long, but were rather captured and taken to Sweden.

 

          Among the soldiers, and especially the foot soldiers, there was great hunger and deprivation and many of them had to subsist on cabbage stalks, but even so many starved to death and came to the end of their days.

 

          During the return march the above‑mentioned Heinrich von Dohna was mortally wounded on October 28 by a Pernau musketeer who, along with several others, had concealed himself in a thicket. He died of this wound at Gudeman's Creek, on the last day of October at eleven o'clock at night and was respectfully interred in the cathedral at Riga on December 5.

 

          The Grand Duke of Moscow had sent a grand delegation to Denmark. This delegation had arrived at Arensburg on Ösel during its return journey. A large number of prominent Russians were sent from Dorpat, Narva and other places to Wiek to join it in order to better insure their own safety. This was at the very time and at almost the very place that the two opposing armies were fighting over the castle of Lode and the heavy artillery.[38]

 

          Dear God, how must those Russians have delighted in that and the sadistic Grand Duke must have chuckled in Moscow when the two Christian kings of Poland and Sweden, who the Dear God had ordained and appointed the protectors and guardians of His Christians of that area, fought each other to exhaustion. This later allowed him to deal with each in turn, at his own best convenience, sooner and with greater success, and to work his will.

 

          [40a] After the above‑mentioned Mecklenburg marriage compact had been concluded between the Duke of Prussia and the Duke of Courland at Kaunas, Duke Johann Albrecht[39] went with his wife, sister, and his eldest son to Königsberg and then on to the King at the Polish reichstag to discuss the freeing of his brother, Duke Christopher, and also the succession of his young son Sigismund Augustus[40] to the archbishopric of Riga which had just now become vacant. The discussions regarding the release of Duke Christopher went so well that he would have been freed had not new and unforeseen events intervened to prevent it.[41]

 

          He achieved similar favorable response to the other point as well, obtaining the archdiocese for his son. He dispatched one of his generals from Mecklenburg with a ship full of provisions and other supplies to Riga in order to stock and secure the castles of the archdiocese. But after this no additional supplies were sent.

 

                                                    The year 1564

 

          In the meanwhile the Duke of Prussia sent his trusted legate Friedrich von Kanitz to the Duke of Courland informing him that if he were serious about the maiden from Mecklenburg, then he would have to do something about it, present himself in person at Königsberg, etc. He was reluctant to do so without first knowing more and so, in order to avoid any offense or insult, he sent one of his trusted servants[42] ahead in order to inquire as to the particulars. When the latter found good will on all sides, he sincerely advised his lord to join him, which the Duke did, arriving in Königsberg on March 8. There, praise God, the old, illustrious lord of Prussia and his daughter, the Duchess of Mecklenburg, expedited the agreement between the Duke and the maiden. (Duke Johann Albrecht was still with the king at the reichstag.) Matters having been happily concluded, he left there and returned to Courland.

 

          When Duke Johann Albrecht, the maiden's brother, returned to Königsberg he was given a complete account of everything.[43] [40b] He was more or less in accord and promised the other lords and his kinsmen support of their actions, all other things remaining equal.

 

          Nothing else worthy of note took place in 1564[44] except that the Swedish commander, Henrik Klassen (Heinrich Claussen),[45] Knight of Konckas (Kankas), recaptured the castle of Lode after a long siege. This was the same castle which the royal army had earlier rescued from Ake Bengtsson's siege.[46]

 

          Also a new prophet, or man of God as he called himself, but in reality a rogue at heart and a godless charlatan, a peasant from Ösel, set himself up in the church at Kusal (Kusel), usurping authority over those districts and proclaiming that no longer would Sunday be hallowed, but rather Thursday, since it, above all the other days of the week, had once helped God when He was in distress.[47] And he was very well received by the Estonian peasants. One sees, may God change it, how well the people of these regions, and of the entire country, had been instructed and educated in the Word of God.[48] The following song was sung of them and also of their rulers in general:

 

                      The Livonian peasant climbs a tree

                      and carves saddle and bridle for his lord.

                      He makes his boots and spurs

                      and he fills his silo with grain.[49]

                      He renders the pastor his due,

                      yet he knows nothing of the Lord God.

                      Dear God, how will they answer for that,

                      those who have profited from the sweat of their brow.

                      Better had they gained nothing at all,

                      for they will be repaid with eternal damnation

                      and roast in Hell with the devil.

 

          The Margrave of Baden and his wife, the Lady Cecilia, arrived in Reval from Stockholm in December and returned to their country by way of Livonia, Prussia, Pomerania and Mecklenburg.[50]

 

                                                [41a] The year 1565

 

          King Erik still had the city and castle of Pernau under his control at this time. But just when his governor there, Andreas Persson, least expected it, several horsemen who had previously served the Duke of Courland and royal governor and magistrate for Poland in Livonia (along with some others whom I will not mention) conferred with him as to how they might turn that fortress over to him and thus expel King Erik's soldiers from it. The duke was receptive to the request from the horsemen and from some others, indeed it was the only proper and fitting thing for him to do, and so he dispatched his horsemen for that purpose, at the agreed upon time and place. They enjoyed complete success on April 29, on the Third Sunday after Easter, at one o'clock in the night preceding Monday. This came about through a careful plan of the above‑mentioned horsemen: they claimed that they were about to depart and so they had organized a farewell party at the house of the man who had the keys to the gate in his keeping. They invited many of the Swedish officers and others as well to the party. Then they took their host's keys which were hanging on his bed and opened the gates to the Courish horsemen. These then took over the city and captured the above‑mentioned governor who was not in the castle, but rather at the manor of Audor (Audern). They sent him first to the Duke of Courland and then to the King of Poland.

 

          The men in the castle were unable to assist their hard‑pressed comrades in the city with anything except gunfire. The former held the castle for six entire weeks but then, when they realized they could expect no reinforcements since King Erik was involved in a campaign against the King of Denmark, they surrendered on Whitsuneve, June 9, handing over substantial artillery, shot, powder and other materiel necessary to the defense of such a fortress against powerful foes.[51]

 

          After the capture of the city and castle of Pernau the Germans in Dorpat were taken away to Moscow, as had also been done earlier. The Russians [41b] were afraid that the Germans in Dorpat would do the same thing to them that they, the Germans, had done to the Swedes at Pernau.[52]

 

          That same summer the Duke went in person to Pernau and again launched his forces against the Swedes: four squadrons of horsemen and a few foot soldiers. There were several sharp skirmishes and the horsemen gave a good account of themselves, but they lost their commander, Casper von Oldenbockem. He was unexpectedly struck by a stray shot and died and was buried in Pernau. The horsemen then disbanded and dispersed here and there, like sheep gone astray when the shepherd is slain.[53]

 

          The following fall the Duke of Courland again went to the king, going first to Wolkonick in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and then on to Vilna. He discussed weighty matters with him[54] and the latter returned Pernau to him as its appropriate lord and governor. He also gave him the new ducal seal and bestowed great honor and favor upon him.

 

                                                    The year 1566

 

          It was explained above how the Duke of Courland left Königsberg, having brought his marriage plans to a happy conclusion. Several of the maiden's closest blood relatives and kinsmen, her mother, brothers and others, were strongly opposed and did not wish to allow the marriage to take place in light of the incredibly great danger which the Muscovite and Sweden posed for the country. The illustrious old Duke of Prussia, as the one who had made the promises to the Duke of Courland, did everything he could to expedite and settle the matter. He appealed to the King of Poland for assistance and the latter sent one of his own emissaries, Sützlow von Messeluntz, along with the duke's own legates, to the two princely and electoral houses of Brandenburg and Mecklenburg on behalf of the Duke of Courland to discuss the matter of the maiden and to urge their acceptance of the marriage. [42a] They promised that if the King of Poland's advice were followed then His Majesty would accept the maiden as his own daughter and would love and honor her as such. This royal promise made to the Duke of Courland and to the affected relatives and kinsmen, as well as the maiden's own unwavering determination, brought about a consent and agreement.[55]

 

          Thereupon commissioners from both Prussia and Mecklenburg, Johann Heut, captain of Rastenburg, Baltzer Gantz, chief secretary, Werner Hän and Dr. Laurentz Kirchoff, were sent to Courland where they and the Courish officials[56] inspected the properties which were to become the bride's own and concluded arrangements for their transfer.[57]

 

          Although it had been decided that the royal wedding was to take place in Königsberg on Shrove‑Tuesday of 1566, and although all the guests had been invited for that date, the groom was unable to appear then since he, as governor of Livonia, had first to drive away the Swedish forces which were once again threatening Pernau and thus insure the security of those districts. It was not until March 11, the Monday after the Second Sunday in Lent, at two o'clock in the afternoon that he arrived in Königsberg. This had caused great discomfort for the old lord[58] since he had been burdened for fourteen days with the visiting guests, along with all their prominent lords, knights and noblemen.

 

          The King of Poland had also sent his illustrious legate, Sir Jan Kostka (Johann Kosska), the captain of Marienburg.[59] But the latter learned that the Duke of Courland would be unable to arrive on either Quinquagesima Sunday or the following Sunday, the First Sunday in Lent, on account of the Swedish attack on Pernau. As a Catholic he was also uncomfortable participating in a wedding celebration during Lent, an inappropriate time. And so he took his leave and departed, though praising the Duke of Courland for placing the common good before his own interests. Let the public safety be the supreme law.[60]

 

          [42b] In spite of all this the royal wedding was celebrated in God's Name and after the completion of the festivities, which lasted a full fourteen days, the Duke of Courland and his wife were escorted as far as Memel by Duke Johann Albrecht, his wife, and Duke Franz of Saxony.[61] They rested, bade each other farewell and then sadly took leave of one another. The latter returned to Königsberg[62] while the former went to Goldingen in Courland where they were formally acknowledged as the land's resident sovereigns in the presence of Duke Magnus of Holstein,[63] the legates from Prussia and Mecklenburg, i.e., Abraham von Dohna, Friedrich von Aulaken, Joachim Rohr, and Melchior von der Lühe, as well as by the knights and noblemen of Courland.

 

          As mentioned above, the Duke of Courland was the country's royal governor, but he did not permanently reside among the people of Transdüna governing their affairs, for he neither could nor wished to neglect his own interests in the Duchy. The people of Transdüna sent some from among their number to His Royal Majesty to respectfully request an administrator who knew the German language and who would permanently reside among them in their country. They recommended to His Majes