| last updated 
      10/30/2014 
		News / Information / Media Literacy. 
		What is Information Literacy? 
		  
		  Multiple 
		  "literacies" for multiple technologies.
		  The use 
		  of texts, tools, and technologies to access news, information and 
		  entertainment.
		  Skills 
		  for critical thinking - 
		  The Critical Thinking Process
		  
		  Abilities to create messages across media
		  Comfort 
		  with reflection, evaluation and ethical thinking about messages 
		  and information sources. Key 
	  Skills of Information / News / Media Literacy 
		  
		  Judging 
		  credibility of authors, sources and messages 
			  
			  Who 
			  is the author (and what are his qualifications and reputation and 
			  that of the publisher)?
			  What 
			  is the purpose of the message?  (point of view, outcome 
			  desired, etc.)
			  How 
			  is the message constructed?  (what is seen and unseen, 
			  edited, distorted, etc.)
		  Using 
		  media "codes" for analysis.  (see previous notes on "What is 
		  News" and "News as Persuasion" and "Bias"  
		  (See "Critical Media" 
		  notes)
		  Finding 
		  and confirming information from multiple and reliable sources 
			  
			  What 
			  makes sources more or less reliable?  (the author's sources? 
			  information in context?)
			  What 
			  constitutes an appropriate search (for news and information)?
			  How 
			  does new information fit with what we already know 
			  and can trust?
		  
		  Evaluating the "argument." 
			  
			  Does 
			  the information source use support material?  of good 
			  quality?
			  Does 
			  the information source reason well (e.g. support is relevant and 
			  does it actually proves the point)?   
				  
				  
				  Consider the "warrant," that is how the support/evidence 
				  "proves" the point being made.
			  Does 
			  the information source avoid fallacies and biases (e.g. 
			  confirmation bias, ad 
			  hominem, post hoc, false analogies, anecdotal evidence, etc.)? 
			  Does 
			  the information source deal effectively with "counter-arguments?"
			  or even acknowledge them?
			  Does 
			  the message truncate reasoning and reflection (with emotion, 
			  fallacies, appeals to in-group/out-groups, mental shortcuts) or 
			  facilitate.
			  Is 
			  there a theme that "frames" the message and is it reasonable given 
			  the "facts."
 |