M.C. CONSULTING
“Quality
Communication Consultations”
Consulting
Team 2 Report Form – Report # 5
|
Team
Name: C.H.E.T. “Communicating to Help Employee
Teamwork” Report Date: Friday October 15th, 2004 Meeting
Dates Since Last Report: 3 meetings Monday October 11th,2004 Tuesday October 12th,
2004 Wednesday October 13th, 2004 Absences:
None, One, One
Summary of What Was
Discussed / Work Done: Monday
October 11, 2004- Team members gathered
in Bowers Hall for their regularly scheduled meeting. Last week we had a terrific wuccess with our product pitch. The team all agreed that their hard work
and dedication was well worth the sweat!
We also discussed what went well with in our product pitch and what
could have used some improvement. We
agreed that there was some stumbling over words that occurred and we may have
wanted to be more specific in the actual pitch with the CONTENT of the
program. This evaluation will help us
in preparation for the actual training program. On Monday we also went over the study guide
for this week’s midterm and answer any questions that may arise. Tuesday October 12, 2004- Team CHET received
notification that their problem solving training program got a big thumbs up
from President Chet
Amagan. During lab time, the team went
over the notes that Chet made on the Product Pitch and the Presentation critique. Team CHET Was very pleased with the results
of the pitch. They look forward to
working on the remaining part of the Problem Solving program! Team
CHET decided to meet again tomorrow @ 2 pm, to complete their sample
module. Wednesday October 13, 2004- Nikki Fisher,
Lindsay Clark and Crystal Lang met and completed the sample module that is
due on October
15, 2004. We discussed which objective
we should focus this module on an agreed that Small Group Roles would be a good
objective to use. With in this module,
the team attempted to use training resources and come up with some creative
ways to display this information to the trainees. After finishing our rough
draft of the sample module, we talked about deadlines for the program part of
this project. We all agreed that we
should individually come up with ideas for all of our objectives. By doing so we can brainstorm the next time
we meet as to how we should lay out our plan and how to address our
objectives. Kimi was unable to attend
this meeting due to work conflicts. Assignments for Future Work /
Deadlines: ü
Each of the group members were assigned to take time
and review the suggestions that President Amagan made on the Product
pitch. ü
Each group member was assigned to think of active
training techniques that would be helpful in the development of their module. ü
Each group member should take an active part in outlining the Program modules to fit the
objectives ü
Any changes that need to be made to the Product Pitch
must be submitted to the Team Liaison by Friday October 15, 2004. o
All changes will be made by Tuesday October 19th
by * Team CHET will be presenting to the class
(trainees) on November 16th, 2004!* Our Assessment of Our Teamwork
and Task Progress (Strengths and Weaknesses): Due to midterms,
this week was somewhat hectic for the group members. Our teamwork this week was pretty decent;
however we could have delved into the program modules a little more. Team
CHET celebrated their successes thorough sending emails to group members
congratulating them on a job well done and pointing out the good points and
the need to be improved points. Our strength in teamwork this week revolved
around our positive outcome of the product pitch! One weakness we had this week was with
scheduling, as usual. The task progress was average this week. Normally team CHET gets ahead of the game
however a weakness we encountered was that we did not have time to work on
each module. A strength we encountered was in evaluating our Product Pitch.
This brought tour attentions some key areas that were phenomenal and others
that need improvement. Overall, it was
an average week. Submitted by:
Crystal
C. Lang |
