CATA 335 - McGaan
Practice
Exercises 9
In the following
arguments you must identify or infer and write out the claim, grounds and
warrant. Label the warrent by type (i.e. analogy, cause, definition, etc.).
Then identify or invent an appropriate backing, qualifier, and reservation.
1. If [gr.] we can reduce the amount
of cocaine which enters the country illegally each month, [cl.] the
number of cocaine related deaths should decrease [q.] somewhat.
w.
If you
reduce/eliminate the cause, you will reduce/eliminate the effect -- (cause)
b. basic principle of causation / definition of causation
/ logic textbook
r.
unless there is already
a large reserve supply of cocaine available
2. [gr.]
Hillary Clinton=s economic plan will reduce financial burdens on families and increase
economic growth while allowing us to strengthen social security. That=s why [cl.] support her plan.
Q. most definitely
w.
If a plan will
provide a good outcome, support it!!
(policy)
b.
Basic principle of
policy analysis, common sense, McGaan says so.
r. unless
there are other unintended consequences that cause more harm than good.
3. When [gr.] a candidate starts
using lots of negative campaign ads, it usually means [cl.] he=s well behind in the polls.
Q. probably
w.
negative
campaigning is a sign of desperation.
(sign)
b.
researchers have
shown this has been the case in many past elections
r.
unless, the
candidate is responding to negative ads from her opponent.
4. [w.] The
percentage of graduates who obtain a job in their field within six months of
receiving their B.A. degree is a good measure of the quality of a college. (sign
or definition) Therefore, [cl.] Monmouth is a very
good college. Q. most likely
gr. Monmouth has
a high percent of graduates who obtain a job in their field within six months
of receiving their B.A.
b.
US News uses this
criteria to judge colleges and they’re experts
r. unless
the new graduates are often fired quickly because of lack of ability.
5. [gr.] Both Joe Namath and Jim McMahon
predicted their teams would win the Super Bowl and they did. Thus, [cl.] it's
smart to bet on a team whose quarterback predicts a victory. Q usually
w.
These two cases are
representative of the typical Superbowl situation. (induction)
b.
The two teams and
these quarterbacks can be shown to be quite similar to most Superbowl
contenders in terms of talent, personality, experience, etc.
r. unless it turns out that a number of other
quarterbacks have predicted victory and lost
last updated 9/15/2005