The following material has been published on the web by Prof. Tom Sienkewicz for his students at Monmouth College. If you have any questions, you can contact him at firstname.lastname@example.org.
CLAS210 Ancient Literature: Love Poetry
1st Semester 1999-2000, Department of Classics, Monmouth College
Resource Summary and Review
Each student will prepare a review (1000 word minimum) on a print or electronic resource dealing with some aspect of lyric poetry in ancient Greece or Rome. You should look for a resource which you might be able to use for your individualized project. Appropriate resources include books, journal articles and websites. In some cases, a chapter in a book may be appropriate. Since the appropriateness of your choice of material will review be part of your grade, it is advisable that you consult early with your instructor about your choice. Also, please note that material cannot be reviewed by more than one person in the class. The print resource must come from the Hewes Library collection; i.e., no interlibrary loan material accepted. Available journal resources include the American Journal of Archaeology, American Journal of Philology, Archaeology, Classical Journal, Classical Outlook, Classical Philology, Classical World, Helios, Phoenix, and Transactions of the American Philological Association.
Each review must include in its top matter standard bibliographic information (including Hewes Library call number). See Prof. Sienkewicz' Book Review Guidelines for suggested format. In addition you should submit to the instructor a photocopy of the entire journal article or the title page and table of contents of a book or the main page of a website.
Within the body of the review you must address the following questions: 1.) What are the main points/features of this resource? 2.) How does the author develop these points/features? What ancient sources and evidence are used to illustrate these points? 3.) How is the subject of this article related to the course topic (ancient love poetry) and, specifically, to topics and evidence discussed in class? 4.) What are the author's qualifications for dealing with this material? and 5.) What is your own evaluation of the author's work? Note: In order to answer question #4 you may have to look at the flyleaf of the book cover, consult a biographical reference book, or even do a websearch.
All reports are to be submitted electronically to all members of the course via the college computer network (In order to do this send your paper to CLAS2101, LATN2101 and GREK2101). The grade for this project will be 10% of the final grade and will be based upon at least the following criteria: the quality (and length) of the material chosen; its appropriateness for the assignment; writing style; and completion of assignment instructions.
Both the instructor and one other student will write statements evaluating this review (which will be submitted only to the author of the review, not to the entire class). Authors are encouraged to use the reviews of other classmates as resources in revising their reviews for resubmission. Your evaluation of a student's work should address at least the following questions: 1.) Does this review follow the assignment guidelines? 2.) What are the best features of this review? 3.) How would you improve it? 4.) How would you use this review to improve your own review?
Students are expected to read all of these reviews, which become part of the
course material. Those who make significant reference to this material in other
assignments, and especially on tests, will automatically receive higher grades.
This assignment will count 10% of your final grade.
Return to Monmouth College Department of Classics Homepage