| 
 
 
  
  
  
  
   
 |  | 
	
		| Calendar | 
		Office Information | 
	 
	
		| Style Sheet | 
	 
	
		Note:  This webpage 
		is subject to revision throughout the semester.   
		Whatever version is online here represents the current, active, and binding 
		syllabus. | 
	 
 
	
		|   Welcome to your homepage for Mark Willhardt's section of English 110.  
This syllabus will act as both your guide and contract for this course, so be 
sure to keep a hard copy with you, as well as check back often:  I'm 
infamous for changing my syllabi and what's on the web is always the most 
current -- and definitive -- syllabus for the course. 
   | 
	 
	
		TEXTS:
	- Faigley, Lester and Selzer, Jack.  Good Reasons with 
	Contemporary Arguments.  3rd Edition.   New York: 
	Pearson/Longman, 2007.
 
  
	- Hacker, Diana.  The Bedford Handbook.  8th Edition.  
	Boston:  Bedford/St. Martins, 2010.  (This is the same book 
	required in Introduction to Liberal Arts.)
 
  | 
	 
	
		| THE IDEA BEHIND THE COURSE: One of the most challenging aspects of college is learning that you've got 
something to say, something which matters.  That idea might seem odd to 
you,  since most of you have no problems talking -- which means that you 
must be saying something all the time, right?  Right.  The problem is 
that once you come to "college" discussions and writing, you might feel that you 
lack the information, confidence, and skill to communicate well what you've got 
to say or that what you've got to say is obvious, pointless, worthless.  And 
those things might mean that you don't speak at all, which would be a 
shame. 
This course, then, is going to be about learning to speak what's on your mind 
in such a way that your audience is going to listen and, maybe, be convinced 
that what you're saying is not only smart, but that it's also right.  To do this, you're 
going to have to learn a variety of ways to communicate your opinions and ideas 
to an audience via your writing.  By concentrating on a number of commonly 
used "modes" of written communication -- forms which you're going to employ time 
and again in your college careers -- we're going to see if we can't get you to 
hone your writing and your ideas at the same time. 
   | 
		  | 
		COURSE OBJECTIVES: 
After completing ENGL 110, you will be 
able to: 
		
			- 
			
Use 
the steps in the writing process to compose well-reasoned, informed arguments. 
   
			- 
			
Identify and use developmental and organizational strategies for effective 
thesis-focused writing.   
   
			- 
			
			Write college-level essays characterized by appropriate word choice 
			and diction, standard usage, spelling, and mechanics. 
   
			- 
			
			Practice effective critical and
			close reading strategies in nonfiction essays. 
			 
		 
		   | 
	 
 
	
		| THE WRITING: You will write FOUR thesis-focused essays during 
the course of this semester, including a brief research project.  Each of 
these essays will engage of different "mode" of writing, which means that no two 
pieces will be exactly alike during the semester.  What binds, them, 
however is that you have to start with an arguable assertion -- a "thesis" -- 
and then presents reasons why your assertion makes sense.  In this regard, 
everything we're going to be writing will be argumentative, an attempt to put 
forth your own ideas and opinions for a given audience. 
The modal essays we will engage in here are: 
   | 
	 
	
		
	- A Film, Game, or Music Review (Evaluation)
		- Evaluative essays are pieces which ask you to judge one thing's 
		worth against a standard.  Sometimes that standard will be 
		understood:  you've been told forever that complete sentences 
		are better than fragments so there's no need to write out that point.  
		Other times the standards will be explicit:  sometimes 
		fragments are used for effect in a piece of writing and you'd need to tell 
		us that is better than having unintentional fragments.  
 
	 
	 
  | 
	 
	
		
	- A Proposal
		- When you write a proposal you're taking a stand on an issue and 
		devising a way to resolve it.  You have to state the problem 
		clearly and then lay out the most convincing reasons why your solution 
		is suitable, if not the best one.  
 
	 
	 
  | 
	 
	
		
	- A Position Essay
		- Like the Proposal, a position essay is one where you take a stand on 
		an issue.  Unlike the Proposal, however, the goal is not to suggest 
		a solution but to demonstrate that your vision of the issue makes the 
		most sense.  In order to do this, you have to examine not only your 
		side of things, but understand the other side fully, acknowledging its 
		strong points, then answering back with your own claims.
 
	 
	 
  | 
	 
	
		
	- A Research Project
		- Most of you will have written a "research paper" in high school.  
		Mostly this was a string of quotations, I'm betting.  That means 
		that you did your notecards (lots of them) and made your outline, then 
		put in quotations where the roman numerals were.  You strung quotes 
		together.  Real research starts with a question you want to 
		answer and moves you through to an answer.  It makes you argue 
		your own point of view using the evidence of other people's work 
		along the way.  We're going to be writing a very brief research 
		essay based upon a packet of materials that I will give you.  You 
		will use those materials -- and only those materials -- as the work 
		which will support the argument that you want to make.
 
	 
	 
  | 
	 
	
		| The Portfolio Finally, I would like you to keep ALL your prewritings, draft materials, 
feedback sheets and final copies in ONE folder -- your  Portfolio 
-- if you would.  I will be examining all of these in my reading of your 
finished work and so need to have all of them in one place.   
   | 
	 
 
	
		| 
GRADES In this class, the most important thing is to learn how to think and to 
write. Counterintuitively, grades don't always help this, mostly because you're trying to figure 
out what I want to hear rather than learning what you need to know.  Often 
if you're writing to get a grade, it's likely that you're not going to do so 
well in here because you're missing the most fundamental thing about writing:  
it's done to teach yourself something, not done to earn some mark.  Once 
you accept that, you're going to find that writing comes easier. 
First of all, to learn the things we're covering in this class, you have to 
be in this class.  You have four absences allowed in this class, free for 
nothing.  On the fifth, however, I reserve the right to fail you for the 
course; missing more than one week of any given semester means that you've 
missed a great deal indeed.  So, please, take the four cuts, but don't take 
any more. 
Learning things is hard, primarily because you have to fail a great deal 
to get better.  (Think of learning to walk -- more time down than up for a 
while, isn't there?)  I know that you've been "writing" for a long time, 
but most of you haven't really engaged the full of your intellectual abilities 
while you've been doing it.  I'm going to ask that you do.  And, 
initially, it's likely that you're going to fall down when I ask you to.  
This is normal, expected, and, finally, worthwhile. 
What does "falling down" mean, though, exactly?  Well, it means that 
initially you're likely to receive grades lower than what you've received 
before.  My standards are higher, my criticisms more probing, my reactions 
fuller than the teachers you've had before (at least I'm betting they are); 
these things mean that I believe in giving you lots of feedback on your writing 
and I expect that you will use that feedback to improve your pieces, taking 
criticism from one essay and using it to help you with the next.  I believe 
that your responsibility is to apply yourself to each draft, rough and final, so 
that you improve it in substantial ways.  This improvement will help tell 
the story of what you've learned over the course of the semester. 
GRADING POLICY ON LATE SUBMISSIONS:  Essays are to be submitted 
during the class period on the day they come due.  Any essay turned in on 
the due date, but after that class period, will be reduced by half a letter 
grade, immediately.  For every day late thereafter, it is reduced a further 
full letter grade.   
   | 
	 
	
		| Grading Scale Like most profs, I employ a fairly standard range of grades: 
		
			
				
				  | 
				An 
"A" indicates an essay which achieves all the goals of a given assignment with 
				excellence, including fluent writing skills.  
				 | 
			 
			
				
				  | 
				A "B" indicates a good essay, 
with solid writing and most of the goals met.   | 
			 
			
				
				  | 
				A "C" indicates an 
				average 
essay, with writing and goals that are okay but which still need focus, craft 
and more time devoted to them.    | 
			 
			
				
				  | 
				A "D" indicates an essay which often 
	has the form and some of the writing of the specific mode which we're 
	employing, but lacks a central, convincing focus, doesn't support its 
	points, and/or has many writing problems.   | 
			 
			
				
				  | 
				An "F" indicates an essay that does 
	not meet a majority of the criteria set forward in the assignment and 
	evaluation sheet.  | 
			 
			
				
				  | 
				Pluses and minuses act as 
indicators of which direction the essay tends -- better toward the grade above 
or worse toward the grade below. 
  | 
			 
			 
		 | 
	 
	
		REVISING AN ESSAY 
 Because I believe that writing is revision -- something we'll talk 
about endlessly in class -- I also believe that you ought to have the 
opportunity to revise your weakest single work during the course of the 
semester.  Thus, I would encourage you to choose one of your essays and 
revise it for a higher mark.   
In order to do this three things must happen: 
		
			
				
				  | 
				You must make an office appointment with me to discuss the strengths and 
	weaknesses of the piece, and to plot revision strategies; | 
			 
			
				
				  | 
				You must demonstrate substantial revisions to the piece (which 
	means changing structure, argument, support, etc. and not just "correcting" 
	punctuation and what I've marked in my line-edits); and | 
			 
			
				
				  | 
				You must write me a cover letter to the revision telling me what you did 
	and why you did it as you revised the piece. | 
			 
			 
		The revision will be due one week after 
the first essay is returned to you.  This deadline is non-negotiable. 
   | 
	 
	
		| A Word on Page Lengths Finally, though I believe that page limits are 
often more problematic than helpful, I also believe that any adequate discussion 
of any topic worth discussing (and anything you write in here is worth 
discussing) can't be done in less than three pages.  Since part of the 
purpose of learning a writing process is to help you develop an idea over time, 
three pages is a suitable minimum length to demonstrate that development. 
This means that two-page "essays" -- which I would really 
consider a class exercise only -- will be given an "F" upon their reception 
and returned unmarked.  Should 
that occur, I would suggest you immediately schedule an appointment with me and 
take that essay as your revision. 
   | 
	 
 
	
		| 
		Education is a moral act; to learn is to learn 
		to be moral.  This fundamental tenet underlies the two points 
		below.   | 
		 
	
		| 
		PLAGIARISM This is really simple: 
if
you copy someone else's direct words or exact ideas -- intentionally or not -- without giving them credit
you fail the class.  Universities and colleges are built 
		upon the notion that ideas matter; if you plagiarize someone else's 
		ideas, you're denying that basic ideal.  Thus there will be zero 
		tolerance for plagiarism in here.  (Please see also page 18, "Academic Dishonesty," in the
college's  2008-09 catalog and Sections 55-57 of Hacker's Bedford Handbook, 
		as well as relevant sections of the Scots Guide.) 
		     | 
		
		 ACADEMIC DISHONESTY 
		Although plagiarism is the highest form of academic dishonesty, it is 
		not the only one.  Submitting substantially the same work to two 
		classes, for instance, is another sort.  It should be assumed, 
		unless told otherwise, that such dual submission is not allowed (is 
		never allowed).  Likewise, inappropriate collaboration with a 
		partner, roommate, tutor, or even parent can result in censure for 
		academic dishonesty.  There are other sorts of academic dishonesty 
		too numerous to elaborate here.  Just realize that any such 
		infractions will be dealt with on a case by case basis, with minimum 
		punishment being a zero on a given essay and maximum being failure for 
		the course. 
		   | 
		 
	
		
		 
		
		The Mellinger Learning Center
     
    The Mellinger Writing Center 
    is available for all students: strong as well as inexperienced writers can 
    benefit from suggestions and help from others. Even professional writers get 
    feedback from colleagues, friends, and editors. Our writing fellows provide 
    confidential help with any stage of the writing process: generating ideas; 
    organizing paragraphs; writing introductions, conclusions, or transitions; 
    or developing an analysis or topic.  | 
		 
	 
	
    CALENDAR:  
	
	 
      
    Note:  
	All 
	readings are due the day on which they appear.  
 
      
    Finally, 
	 always bring the essay you're currently writing to class. 
      
  
	
	
		| 
		DATE | 
		
		TOPIC | 
		
		READING DUE | 
		
		 LEXICON TERMS  | 
		
		 
		WRITING/ 
		ASSIGNMENT DUE  | 
	 
	
		| 
		R 1/13 | 
		
	An Introduction -- What's Going On Here? | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
	 
	
		| 
		F 1/14 | 
		
	  | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
		
		Diagnostic Essay | 
	 
	
		| 
		M 1/17 | 
		
	
	NO CLASS:  MLK DAY | 
	 
	
		| 
		T
	
		1/18 | 
		
	
	What'd I Do?: The Diagnostics Return    | 
		
	    | 
		
	
	{Exposition}  
	Argument   | 
		
	
    
	    | 
	 
	
		| 
		R
	
		1/20 | 
		
	
	Learning to Read:  QAR & Annotation | 
		
	
		GR, Chapter One 
		Schlosser, GR 567 | 
		
	
	Argument 
		Annotation  | 
		
	  | 
	 
	
		| 
		F
	
		1/21 | 
		
	
	Learning to Read: Outline  | 
		
	
	 
		Schlosser, GR 567  | 
		
	  | 
		
	
	
		Check of Annotations in 
	GR  | 
	 
	
		| 
	M
	
	1/24 | 
		
	
	Learning to Read: Paraphrase and Summary  | 
		
	
	Chapter Four 
		
    Silko, GR 164 | 
		
	
		Close Reading 
		Rhetoric 
		Logos 
		Ethos 
		Pathos 
		Analysis  | 
		
	
	 
		
		Sketch Outline of Schlosser 
	
		Formal Outline of Schlosser 
     | 
	 
	
		| 
	T
	
	1/25 | 
		
	
	Rhetoric & Its Uses     | 
		
	
		GR 
		Chapter Four 
		
		Giuliani and Romney on Immigration   | 
		
	
		Evidence 
		Documentation   | 
		
	
	
		
		Paraphrase of Schlosser, Paragraph 7 
	Summary of Schlosser in toto 
	
	
		Rhetorical Analysis of Schlosser 
		Due on the 28th  | 
	 
	
		| 
	R
	
	1/27 | 
		
	
	The Paris Hilton Paragraphs: Extended 
	Definition    | 
		
	
		Extended Definition    | 
		
	
		The Paris Hilton Paragraphs are a 
		light-hearted attempt to introduce you to some serious organizational 
		strategies, ones you can use in each of your essays.  Over the next 
		four days, I want you to practice how to recognize and utilize these 
		strategies.  As you're doing that, though, I want you to have fun 
		with the paragraph-writing itself.  Use your imaginations and bring 
		out your senses of humor as you make Paris Hilton (and all she is and 
		stands for) the center of your exercise paragraphs.   | 
		
	
	"Celebrity" is a term that's often bandied about these days.  
	Write a well-constructed extended definition paragraph exploring this term 
	and then use your definition to explain why/how Paris Hilton is a 
	"celebrity."  
		Due Friday.     | 
	 
	
		| 
	F
	
	1/28 | 
		
	
	The Paris Hilton Paragraphs:  
	Classification and Division    | 
		
	
		Classification & Division    | 
		
		  | 
		
	 
	
		 Write a 
	well-constructed classification and division paragraph on the topic "Types 
	of Young Famous Females Out of Control and On the Front Page." Your goal is 
	to divide and/or classify at least three of the tabloid heroines any trashy 
	newspaper covers -- primary amongst them, of course, Paris Hilton.  Due 
	Monday.  | 
	 
	
		| 
		M
	
		1/31 | 
		
	
	The Paris Hilton Paragraphs:  
	Compare and Contrast     | 
		
	
		Compare & Contrast     | 
		
		  | 
		
	
	Paris Hilton is not...another female celebrity. You choose 
	which one. Write a well-constructed compare and contrast paragraph exploring 
	this idea. (The trick here will be that it's got to be a 
	compare and contrast essay, so your celebs can't be totally opposite 
	-- or if they are you get to be clever and show me how they're alike.) Due
	Tuesday. | 
	 
	
		| 
		T 2/1 | 
		
	
	The Paris Hilton Paragraphs:  Cause 
	and Effect  | 
		
	
		Cause & Effect  | 
		
		  | 
		
		
		Paris Hilton is the cause. Write a well-constructed cause 
		and effect paragraph exploring the full ramifications of this statement. 
		Due Thursday. | 
	 
	
		| 
		R
	
		2/3 | 
		
	
	Yeah, Yeah, But What About Arguments? &
    Arguments, One More Time | 
		
	
		GR 
		Chapters 2 & 3 & Continuing the discussion on what makes for a good 
		argument and how you support one. | 
		
	
		
		Argument 
		Support 
		Evidence 
		Pre-writing 
		Thesis 
		Logical Fallacies 
		Counter-arguments   | 
		
		
		Begin thinking about your
		
		
		Evaluation Essay | 
	 
	
		| 
		F
	
		2/4 | 
		
	
	Evaluations: 
	Arguments and the "Modes"  | 
		
	
		GR Chapter Eight: 
		 
		Evaluation Essays | 
		
	
		Evaluation 
		Pre-writing  | 
		
	  | 
	 
	
		| 
	
		M 2/7  | 
		
	
	Finding Criteria, & Planning   | 
		
	
		
		Owen Gleiberman's Bourne Ultimatum_Review
		
     | 
		
	
	Planning 
		Drafting  | 
		
		  | 
	 
	
		| 
		T
	
		2/8 | 
		
	
	Evaluation:  Audience and Revision | 
		
	
	
		Chris Willman's Review of _High School Musical 2 | 
		
	
		Revision | 
		
	  | 
	 
	
		| 
		R
	
		2/10 | 
		
	
		Reading to Write:  The Hook 
		   | 
		
	
 
	3 Transformers Reviews: 
		
		
		Ebert,
		
		
		Lane,
		
		
		Holtreman  | 
		
	
		Logos 
		Ethos 
		Pathos   | 
		
	  | 
	 
	
		| 
		F
	
		2/11 | 
		
	
		Peer Revision Day | 
	 
	
		| 
		M
	
		2/14 | 
		
	
		Reading to Write:  Craft | 
		
	
 
	3 Transformers Reviews: 
		
		
		Ebert,
		
		
		Lane,
		
		
		Holtreman  | 
		
	
 "Mechanics"?    | 
		
		  | 
	 
	
		| 
		T
	
		2/15 | 
		
		Evaluation:  Paragraphing as Revison | 
		
	3 Transformers Reviews: 
		
		
		Ebert,
		
		
		Lane,
		
		
		Holtreman | 
		
	Revision 
	Editing | 
		
		  | 
	 
	
		| 
		R
	
		2/17 | 
		
		Evaluation:  Pulling It All Together | 
		
		  | 
		
	Editing | 
		
	  | 
	 
	
		| 
		F
	
		2/18 | 
		
	Expansion Day | 
		
	
Evaluation Essay DUE  | 
	 
	
		| 
		M
	
		2/21 | 
		
	Position Essays:  
	Taking a Stand  | 
		
		
	
		GR, Chapter 10:  
		Rebuttal Arguments | 
		
		
	Rebuttal 
		Refutation 
		Documentation | 
		
		Rebuttal Essay Begins | 
	 
	
		| 
		T
	
		2/22 | 
		
		  | 
		
		
		
		GR, Chapter 10:  
		Friedman v. Bennett, GR 177-181 | 
		
		Logos 
		Ethos 
		Pathos | 
		  | 
	 
	
		| 
		R
	
		2/24 | 
		
		    | 
		
	 
	
		GR, Chapter 20 Intro 
		Buchanan GR 409  | 
		
	
	The 
		Elements  of
		Rebuttal  | 
		
		  | 
	 
	
		| 
		F
	
		2/25 | 
		
	 
	
	How Do I Argue Against  
	An "Authority"?  | 
		
	
	Buchanan | 
		
	  | 
		
	  | 
	 
	
		| 
		M
	
		2/28 | 
		
	
		Peer Revision Day | 
	 
	
		| 
		T 3/1 | 
		
	
		An Answer to Pat Buchanan? | 
		
	
	Rayner, GR 414  | 
		
	  | 
		
	  | 
	 
	
		| 
		R
	
		3/3 | 
		
		  | 
		
	Rifkin, GR 452 | 
		
		  | 
		
		  | 
	 
	
		| 
		F
	
		3/4 | 
		
	
		Peer Revision Day | 
	 
	
		| 
		3/5-3/13 | 
		
	SPRING BREAK | 
	 
	
		| 
		M
	
		3/14 | 
		
	
		Proposal Essays:  Offering a Solution | 
		
		
GR, Chapter 11:   
		Proposal Arguments | 
		
		Refutation 
		Rebuttal | 
		
	
		Rebuttal Essay Due 
	
		Proposal Essay Begins  | 
	 
	
		| 
		T
	
		3/15 | 
		
		A Model Essay (?) | 
		
	
		 
		Student Essay in Ch. 11  | 
		
		  | 
		
	  | 
	 
	
		| 
		R
	
		3/17 | 
		
	  | 
		
	
	Cavett (handout) | 
		
	  | 
		
	  | 
	 
	
		| 
		F
	
		3/18 | 
		
	And Now A Word from the Environmental Debate | 
		
	LA Times, GR 344 
	Gregg, GR 345 | 
		
	  | 
		
	  | 
	 
	
		| 
		M
	
		3/21 | 
		
	
		 Peer Revision Day  | 
	 
	
		| 
		T 3/22 | 
		
	
		Audience, Audience, Audience, Audience:  Cleaver GR 642 | 
	 
	
		| 
		R 3/24 | 
		
	Q & A:  Come with Specific Questions from Your Essays | 
	 
	
		| 
		
		F 3/25 | 
		
	
		 Peer Revision Day  | 
	 
	
		| 
		M
	
		3/28 | 
		
	
	
		Research Essays:  Your Mind and Others' 
		
		An Intro to Research, & "Research"    | 
		
	
		
		Chapter 15 
		
		By Way of Introduction:  513-19      | 
		
	
	 
		
		Proposal Essay DUE  
	
	
		You should look at the
		Research Unit at this point and find, 
	and print out, and keep with you at all times, the various articles & essays 
	listed there.  These will be your primary texts for this final essay.   | 
	 
	
		| 
	T
	
	3/29 | 
		
		 
	
	Zaslow (GR 559); Brydolf  | 
	 
	
		| 
		R
	
		3/31 | 
		
	
		Singel; Gross; Tossel | 
	 
	
		| 
		F 4/1 | 
		
	 
	
	Reinhart (x2); Hampel  | 
	 
	
		| 
		M
	
		4/4 | 
		
	
	 
		Integration of Sources:  A Workshop  | 
	 
	
		| 
		T
	
		4/5 | 
		
	 
	Writing Day  | 
	 
	
		| 
		R
	
		4/7 | 
		
	Workshop:  Some Templates to Make Your Life Easier, and Your Writing 
	Better | 
	 
	
		| 
		F
	
		4/8 | 
		
	
	Peer Revision Day | 
	 
	
		| 
		M
	
		4/11 | 
		
	
	More on Integration: Making Your Point
     | 
	 
	
		| 
		T
	
		4/12 | 
		
	 
	Writing Day  | 
	 
	
		| 
		R
	
		4/14 | 
		
	
	Peer Revision Day  | 
	 
	
		| 
		F
	
		4/15 | 
		
	 
	
	Making it Right:  The Final Touches on the Final Essay of the Semester 
	(Come with Questions and Concerns)   | 
	 
	
		| 
		M
	
		4/18 | 
		
	
	Class Cancelled:  I Will Be Available in the 
	Classroom for Walk-In Meetings* *during 
	which I will address very specific and focused questions on writing issues, 
	isolated to single sentences or paragraphs, or tightly defined argumentative 
	elements  | 
	 
	
		| 
		T
	
		4/19 | 
		
	
	Class Cancelled:  I Will Be Available in the 
	Classroom for Walk-In Meetings* *during 
	which I will address very specific and focused questions on writing issues, 
	isolated to single sentences or paragraphs, or tightly defined argumentative 
	elements  | 
	 
	
		| 
	R
	
	4/21 | 
		
	
	Class Cancelled:  I Will Be Available in the 
	Classroom for Walk-In Meetings* *during 
	which I will address very specific and focused questions on writing issues, 
	isolated to single sentences or paragraphs, or tightly defined argumentative 
	elements  | 
	 
	
		| 
		F
	
		4/22 | 
		
	Easter Break | 
	 
		
		| 
		M
	
		4/25 | 
		 
	
		| 
		T
	
		4/26 | 
		
	Writing Day | 
		
	
	Research Essay DUE | 
	 
	
		| 
		R
	
		4/28 | 
		
	
	Our Lexicon  | 
		
	  | 
		
	  | 
	 
	
		| 
		F
	
		4/29 | 
		
	
	Our Lexicon | 
	 
	
		| 
		M 5/2 | 
		
	
	Course Evaluations | 
	 
	
		| 
		T 5/3 | 
		
	
	Wrap Up Day | 
	 
	
		| 
	
		F 5/6, 6:00 PM | 
		
	
		 
		
		FINAL EXAM  | 
	 
 
		 
      
       
      
  
 |