





| |
Calendar |
Office Information |
Style Sheet |
Note: This webpage
is subject to revision throughout the semester.
Whatever version is online here represents the current, active, and binding
syllabus. |
Welcome to your homepage for Mark Willhardt's section of English 110.
This syllabus will act as both your guide and contract for this course, so be
sure to keep a hard copy with you, as well as check back often: I'm
infamous for changing my syllabi and what's on the web is always the most
current -- and definitive -- syllabus for the course.
|
TEXTS:
- Faigley, Lester and Selzer, Jack. Good Reasons with
Contemporary Arguments. 3rd Edition. New York:
Pearson/Longman, 2007.
- Hacker, Diana. The Bedford Handbook. 8th Edition.
Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 2010. (This is the same book
required in Introduction to Liberal Arts.)
|
THE IDEA BEHIND THE COURSE: One of the most challenging aspects of college is learning that you've got
something to say, something which matters. That idea might seem odd to
you, since most of you have no problems talking -- which means that you
must be saying something all the time, right? Right. The problem is
that once you come to "college" discussions and writing, you might feel that you
lack the information, confidence, and skill to communicate well what you've got
to say or that what you've got to say is obvious, pointless, worthless. And
those things might mean that you don't speak at all, which would be a
shame.
This course, then, is going to be about learning to speak what's on your mind
in such a way that your audience is going to listen and, maybe, be convinced
that what you're saying is not only smart, but that it's also right. To do this, you're
going to have to learn a variety of ways to communicate your opinions and ideas
to an audience via your writing. By concentrating on a number of commonly
used "modes" of written communication -- forms which you're going to employ time
and again in your college careers -- we're going to see if we can't get you to
hone your writing and your ideas at the same time.
|
|
COURSE OBJECTIVES:
After completing ENGL 110, you will be
able to:
-
Use
the steps in the writing process to compose well-reasoned, informed arguments.
-
Identify and use developmental and organizational strategies for effective
thesis-focused writing.
-
Write college-level essays characterized by appropriate word choice
and diction, standard usage, spelling, and mechanics.
-
Practice effective critical and
close reading strategies in nonfiction essays.
|
THE WRITING: You will write FOUR thesis-focused essays during
the course of this semester, including a brief research project. Each of
these essays will engage of different "mode" of writing, which means that no two
pieces will be exactly alike during the semester. What binds, them,
however is that you have to start with an arguable assertion -- a "thesis" --
and then presents reasons why your assertion makes sense. In this regard,
everything we're going to be writing will be argumentative, an attempt to put
forth your own ideas and opinions for a given audience.
The modal essays we will engage in here are:
|
- A Film, Game, or Music Review (Evaluation)
- Evaluative essays are pieces which ask you to judge one thing's
worth against a standard. Sometimes that standard will be
understood: you've been told forever that complete sentences
are better than fragments so there's no need to write out that point.
Other times the standards will be explicit: sometimes
fragments are used for effect in a piece of writing and you'd need to tell
us that is better than having unintentional fragments.
|
- A Proposal
- When you write a proposal you're taking a stand on an issue and
devising a way to resolve it. You have to state the problem
clearly and then lay out the most convincing reasons why your solution
is suitable, if not the best one.
|
- A Position Essay
- Like the Proposal, a position essay is one where you take a stand on
an issue. Unlike the Proposal, however, the goal is not to suggest
a solution but to demonstrate that your vision of the issue makes the
most sense. In order to do this, you have to examine not only your
side of things, but understand the other side fully, acknowledging its
strong points, then answering back with your own claims.
|
- A Research Project
- Most of you will have written a "research paper" in high school.
Mostly this was a string of quotations, I'm betting. That means
that you did your notecards (lots of them) and made your outline, then
put in quotations where the roman numerals were. You strung quotes
together. Real research starts with a question you want to
answer and moves you through to an answer. It makes you argue
your own point of view using the evidence of other people's work
along the way. We're going to be writing a very brief research
essay based upon a packet of materials that I will give you. You
will use those materials -- and only those materials -- as the work
which will support the argument that you want to make.
|
The Portfolio Finally, I would like you to keep ALL your prewritings, draft materials,
feedback sheets and final copies in ONE folder -- your Portfolio
-- if you would. I will be examining all of these in my reading of your
finished work and so need to have all of them in one place.
|
GRADES In this class, the most important thing is to learn how to think and to
write. Counterintuitively, grades don't always help this, mostly because you're trying to figure
out what I want to hear rather than learning what you need to know. Often
if you're writing to get a grade, it's likely that you're not going to do so
well in here because you're missing the most fundamental thing about writing:
it's done to teach yourself something, not done to earn some mark. Once
you accept that, you're going to find that writing comes easier.
First of all, to learn the things we're covering in this class, you have to
be in this class. You have four absences allowed in this class, free for
nothing. On the fifth, however, I reserve the right to fail you for the
course; missing more than one week of any given semester means that you've
missed a great deal indeed. So, please, take the four cuts, but don't take
any more.
Learning things is hard, primarily because you have to fail a great deal
to get better. (Think of learning to walk -- more time down than up for a
while, isn't there?) I know that you've been "writing" for a long time,
but most of you haven't really engaged the full of your intellectual abilities
while you've been doing it. I'm going to ask that you do. And,
initially, it's likely that you're going to fall down when I ask you to.
This is normal, expected, and, finally, worthwhile.
What does "falling down" mean, though, exactly? Well, it means that
initially you're likely to receive grades lower than what you've received
before. My standards are higher, my criticisms more probing, my reactions
fuller than the teachers you've had before (at least I'm betting they are);
these things mean that I believe in giving you lots of feedback on your writing
and I expect that you will use that feedback to improve your pieces, taking
criticism from one essay and using it to help you with the next. I believe
that your responsibility is to apply yourself to each draft, rough and final, so
that you improve it in substantial ways. This improvement will help tell
the story of what you've learned over the course of the semester.
GRADING POLICY ON LATE SUBMISSIONS: Essays are to be submitted
during the class period on the day they come due. Any essay turned in on
the due date, but after that class period, will be reduced by half a letter
grade, immediately. For every day late thereafter, it is reduced a further
full letter grade.
|
Grading Scale Like most profs, I employ a fairly standard range of grades:
 |
An
"A" indicates an essay which achieves all the goals of a given assignment with
excellence, including fluent writing skills.
|
 |
A "B" indicates a good essay,
with solid writing and most of the goals met. |
 |
A "C" indicates an
average
essay, with writing and goals that are okay but which still need focus, craft
and more time devoted to them. |
 |
A "D" indicates an essay which often
has the form and some of the writing of the specific mode which we're
employing, but lacks a central, convincing focus, doesn't support its
points, and/or has many writing problems. |
 |
An "F" indicates an essay that does
not meet a majority of the criteria set forward in the assignment and
evaluation sheet. |
 |
Pluses and minuses act as
indicators of which direction the essay tends -- better toward the grade above
or worse toward the grade below.
|
|
REVISING AN ESSAY
Because I believe that writing is revision -- something we'll talk
about endlessly in class -- I also believe that you ought to have the
opportunity to revise your weakest single work during the course of the
semester. Thus, I would encourage you to choose one of your essays and
revise it for a higher mark.
In order to do this three things must happen:
 |
You must make an office appointment with me to discuss the strengths and
weaknesses of the piece, and to plot revision strategies; |
 |
You must demonstrate substantial revisions to the piece (which
means changing structure, argument, support, etc. and not just "correcting"
punctuation and what I've marked in my line-edits); and |
 |
You must write me a cover letter to the revision telling me what you did
and why you did it as you revised the piece. |
The revision will be due one week after
the first essay is returned to you. This deadline is non-negotiable.
|
A Word on Page Lengths Finally, though I believe that page limits are
often more problematic than helpful, I also believe that any adequate discussion
of any topic worth discussing (and anything you write in here is worth
discussing) can't be done in less than three pages. Since part of the
purpose of learning a writing process is to help you develop an idea over time,
three pages is a suitable minimum length to demonstrate that development.
This means that two-page "essays" -- which I would really
consider a class exercise only -- will be given an "F" upon their reception
and returned unmarked. Should
that occur, I would suggest you immediately schedule an appointment with me and
take that essay as your revision.
|
Education is a moral act; to learn is to learn
to be moral. This fundamental tenet underlies the two points
below. |
PLAGIARISM This is really simple:
if
you copy someone else's direct words or exact ideas -- intentionally or not -- without giving them credit
you fail the class. Universities and colleges are built
upon the notion that ideas matter; if you plagiarize someone else's
ideas, you're denying that basic ideal. Thus there will be zero
tolerance for plagiarism in here. (Please see also page 18, "Academic Dishonesty," in the
college's 2008-09 catalog and Sections 55-57 of Hacker's Bedford Handbook,
as well as relevant sections of the Scots Guide.)
|
ACADEMIC DISHONESTY
Although plagiarism is the highest form of academic dishonesty, it is
not the only one. Submitting substantially the same work to two
classes, for instance, is another sort. It should be assumed,
unless told otherwise, that such dual submission is not allowed (is
never allowed). Likewise, inappropriate collaboration with a
partner, roommate, tutor, or even parent can result in censure for
academic dishonesty. There are other sorts of academic dishonesty
too numerous to elaborate here. Just realize that any such
infractions will be dealt with on a case by case basis, with minimum
punishment being a zero on a given essay and maximum being failure for
the course.
|
The Mellinger Learning Center
The Mellinger Writing Center
is available for all students: strong as well as inexperienced writers can
benefit from suggestions and help from others. Even professional writers get
feedback from colleagues, friends, and editors. Our writing fellows provide
confidential help with any stage of the writing process: generating ideas;
organizing paragraphs; writing introductions, conclusions, or transitions;
or developing an analysis or topic. |
CALENDAR:
Note:
All
readings are due the day on which they appear.
Finally,
always bring the essay you're currently writing to class.
DATE |
TOPIC |
READING DUE |
LEXICON TERMS |
WRITING/
ASSIGNMENT DUE |
R 1/13 |
An Introduction -- What's Going On Here? |
|
|
|
F 1/14 |
|
|
|
Diagnostic Essay |
M 1/17 |
NO CLASS: MLK DAY |
T
1/18 |
What'd I Do?: The Diagnostics Return |
|
{Exposition}
Argument |
|
R
1/20 |
Learning to Read: QAR & Annotation |
GR, Chapter One
Schlosser, GR 567 |
Argument
Annotation |
|
F
1/21 |
Learning to Read: Outline |
Schlosser, GR 567 |
|
Check of Annotations in
GR |
M
1/24 |
Learning to Read: Paraphrase and Summary |
Chapter Four
Silko, GR 164 |
Close Reading
Rhetoric
Logos
Ethos
Pathos
Analysis |
Sketch Outline of Schlosser
Formal Outline of Schlosser
|
T
1/25 |
Rhetoric & Its Uses |
GR
Chapter Four
Giuliani and Romney on Immigration |
Evidence
Documentation |
Paraphrase of Schlosser, Paragraph 7
Summary of Schlosser in toto
Rhetorical Analysis of Schlosser
Due on the 28th |
R
1/27 |
The Paris Hilton Paragraphs: Extended
Definition |
Extended Definition |
The Paris Hilton Paragraphs are a
light-hearted attempt to introduce you to some serious organizational
strategies, ones you can use in each of your essays. Over the next
four days, I want you to practice how to recognize and utilize these
strategies. As you're doing that, though, I want you to have fun
with the paragraph-writing itself. Use your imaginations and bring
out your senses of humor as you make Paris Hilton (and all she is and
stands for) the center of your exercise paragraphs. |
"Celebrity" is a term that's often bandied about these days.
Write a well-constructed extended definition paragraph exploring this term
and then use your definition to explain why/how Paris Hilton is a
"celebrity."
Due Friday. |
F
1/28 |
The Paris Hilton Paragraphs:
Classification and Division |
Classification & Division |
|
Write a
well-constructed classification and division paragraph on the topic "Types
of Young Famous Females Out of Control and On the Front Page." Your goal is
to divide and/or classify at least three of the tabloid heroines any trashy
newspaper covers -- primary amongst them, of course, Paris Hilton. Due
Monday. |
M
1/31 |
The Paris Hilton Paragraphs:
Compare and Contrast |
Compare & Contrast |
|
Paris Hilton is not...another female celebrity. You choose
which one. Write a well-constructed compare and contrast paragraph exploring
this idea. (The trick here will be that it's got to be a
compare and contrast essay, so your celebs can't be totally opposite
-- or if they are you get to be clever and show me how they're alike.) Due
Tuesday. |
T 2/1 |
The Paris Hilton Paragraphs: Cause
and Effect |
Cause & Effect |
|
Paris Hilton is the cause. Write a well-constructed cause
and effect paragraph exploring the full ramifications of this statement.
Due Thursday. |
R
2/3 |
Yeah, Yeah, But What About Arguments? &
Arguments, One More Time |
GR
Chapters 2 & 3 & Continuing the discussion on what makes for a good
argument and how you support one. |
Argument
Support
Evidence
Pre-writing
Thesis
Logical Fallacies
Counter-arguments |
Begin thinking about your
Evaluation Essay |
F
2/4 |
Evaluations:
Arguments and the "Modes" |
GR Chapter Eight:
Evaluation Essays |
Evaluation
Pre-writing |
|
M 2/7 |
Finding Criteria, & Planning |
Owen Gleiberman's Bourne Ultimatum_Review
|
Planning
Drafting |
|
T
2/8 |
Evaluation: Audience and Revision |
Chris Willman's Review of _High School Musical 2 |
Revision |
|
R
2/10 |
Reading to Write: The Hook
|
3 Transformers Reviews:
Ebert,
Lane,
Holtreman |
Logos
Ethos
Pathos |
|
F
2/11 |
Peer Revision Day |
M
2/14 |
Reading to Write: Craft |
3 Transformers Reviews:
Ebert,
Lane,
Holtreman |
"Mechanics"? |
|
T
2/15 |
Evaluation: Paragraphing as Revison |
3 Transformers Reviews:
Ebert,
Lane,
Holtreman |
Revision
Editing |
|
R
2/17 |
Evaluation: Pulling It All Together |
|
Editing |
|
F
2/18 |
Expansion Day |
Evaluation Essay DUE |
M
2/21 |
Position Essays:
Taking a Stand |
GR, Chapter 10:
Rebuttal Arguments |
Rebuttal
Refutation
Documentation |
Rebuttal Essay Begins |
T
2/22 |
|
GR, Chapter 10:
Friedman v. Bennett, GR 177-181 |
Logos
Ethos
Pathos |
|
R
2/24 |
|
GR, Chapter 20 Intro
Buchanan GR 409 |
The
Elements of
Rebuttal |
|
F
2/25 |
How Do I Argue Against
An "Authority"? |
Buchanan |
|
|
M
2/28 |
Peer Revision Day |
T 3/1 |
An Answer to Pat Buchanan? |
Rayner, GR 414 |
|
|
R
3/3 |
|
Rifkin, GR 452 |
|
|
F
3/4 |
Peer Revision Day |
3/5-3/13 |
SPRING BREAK |
M
3/14 |
Proposal Essays: Offering a Solution |
GR, Chapter 11:
Proposal Arguments |
Refutation
Rebuttal |
Rebuttal Essay Due
Proposal Essay Begins |
T
3/15 |
A Model Essay (?) |
Student Essay in Ch. 11 |
|
|
R
3/17 |
|
Cavett (handout) |
|
|
F
3/18 |
And Now A Word from the Environmental Debate |
LA Times, GR 344
Gregg, GR 345 |
|
|
M
3/21 |
Peer Revision Day |
T 3/22 |
Audience, Audience, Audience, Audience: Cleaver GR 642 |
R 3/24 |
Q & A: Come with Specific Questions from Your Essays |
F 3/25 |
Peer Revision Day |
M
3/28 |
Research Essays: Your Mind and Others'
An Intro to Research, & "Research" |
Chapter 15
By Way of Introduction: 513-19 |
Proposal Essay DUE
You should look at the
Research Unit at this point and find,
and print out, and keep with you at all times, the various articles & essays
listed there. These will be your primary texts for this final essay. |
T
3/29 |
Zaslow (GR 559); Brydolf |
R
3/31 |
Singel; Gross; Tossel |
F 4/1 |
Reinhart (x2); Hampel |
M
4/4 |
Integration of Sources: A Workshop |
T
4/5 |
Writing Day |
R
4/7 |
Workshop: Some Templates to Make Your Life Easier, and Your Writing
Better |
F
4/8 |
Peer Revision Day |
M
4/11 |
More on Integration: Making Your Point
|
T
4/12 |
Writing Day |
R
4/14 |
Peer Revision Day |
F
4/15 |
Making it Right: The Final Touches on the Final Essay of the Semester
(Come with Questions and Concerns) |
M
4/18 |
Class Cancelled: I Will Be Available in the
Classroom for Walk-In Meetings* *during
which I will address very specific and focused questions on writing issues,
isolated to single sentences or paragraphs, or tightly defined argumentative
elements |
T
4/19 |
Class Cancelled: I Will Be Available in the
Classroom for Walk-In Meetings* *during
which I will address very specific and focused questions on writing issues,
isolated to single sentences or paragraphs, or tightly defined argumentative
elements |
R
4/21 |
Class Cancelled: I Will Be Available in the
Classroom for Walk-In Meetings* *during
which I will address very specific and focused questions on writing issues,
isolated to single sentences or paragraphs, or tightly defined argumentative
elements |
F
4/22 |
Easter Break |
M
4/25 |
T
4/26 |
Writing Day |
Research Essay DUE |
R
4/28 |
Our Lexicon |
|
|
F
4/29 |
Our Lexicon |
M 5/2 |
Course Evaluations |
T 5/3 |
Wrap Up Day |
F 5/6, 6:00 PM |
FINAL EXAM |
|