An A-B
paper will:
-
clearly and concisely summarize the argument
(elucidating its main claim, reasons, organizational pattern, and
other relevant parts)
-
clearly state the article's medium and genre
-
analyze the ethical, logical, and emotional
appeals used in the argument
-
use clear explanation to show how the rhetorical
appeals operate
-
carefully characterize the style of the essay
(syntax and diction)
-
be developed with specific evidence and amass
considerable details from the essay
-
follow an effective organizational pattern which
is appropriate for the audience and has a logical progression
-
include paragraphs which are coherent, unified,
and effectively developed
-
contain a variety of skillfully constructed
sentences
-
promote clarity and effectiveness with standard
usage, mechanics, and spelling; and a precise and ample vocabulary
A C paper will:
-
summarize the argument, but leave out a few parts
(elucidating its main claim, reasons, organizational pattern, and
other relevant parts)
-
state the article's medium and genre, but
incompletely
-
analyze the ethical, logical, and emotional
appeals used in the argument, but omit one or two important appeals
-
use explanation to show how the rhetorical appeals
operate, but have limited explanation
-
characterize the style of the essay but in a
limited way (syntax and diction)
-
be developed with with some specific evidence, but
exclude some central pieces
-
follow an organizational pattern which is
appropriate for the audience and has a somewhat logical progression
-
include paragraphs which are sometimes incoherent
-
contain sentences which are not always
grammatically incorrect
-
might contain a couple of major errors
-
contain sentences with inconsistent use of
standard usage, mechanics, spelling
A D-F
paper will:
-
fail to summarize the argument clearly and
concisely (elucidating its main claim, reasons, organizational
pattern, and other relevant parts)
-
not state the article's medium and genre
-
provide an incomplete analysis of the ethical,
logical, and emotional appeals used in the argument
-
provide a shallow explanation of how the
rhetorical appeals operate
-
mis-characterize the style of the essay (syntax
and diction)
-
use little or no specific evidence to support the
analysis
-
follow a confusing organizational pattern
-
include many paragraphs which are incoherent
-
contain sentences which are often grammatically
incorrect
-
contain many major
errors
-
contain sentences with very inconsistent use of
standard usage, mechanics, spelling
|