Make a ten-minute
presentation on one of the paintings from the calendar. This presentation
should be a hybrid between a traditional presentation and a discussion.
In other words, I'd like you to give us some basic information about the
painting to begin (brief artist biography, date and circumstances
of creation, etc.--2 minutes MAX) and then I'd like you to lead us through
a discussion about the painting in terms of the elements below. In
general, you should elicit and manage our reactions, but also fill in
things we might have missed.
-
What do we see when we look at the
painting? What objects are represented and how are they represented?
What are the formal elements of the painting? (line, color, shapes,
production procedures) Elicit from us what we see and then show how that
aligns with what you see.
-
What are the meanings of the painting?
How might we interpret it? How does this painting relate to a literary
work or an idea from our course? What does it reflect about the
culture/historical moment? Again, elicit from us what we see and
then show how that aligns with what you see.
- Gives us the experts' views. Try to find two or three scholarly
interpretations of the paintings and share their thoughts with us--if you
can't find interpretations of your painting, look at interpretations of the
artist's more famous paintings or work in general and try to make connections that way.
Make
sure to give the critics credit (cite them orally) and
be VERY clear about who said what about your
painting. Give us OVERVIEWS of these ideas--don't read long sections of
their critiques to us.
- Wrap up your presentation with your views on the "best" interpretation of
the painting and what you think it reveals about Victorian culture.
SPEND A LOT OF TIME INTERPRETING YOUR PAINTING BEFORE YOU
DO ANY RESEARCH
After your presentation is over, you should provide us with a
one-page,
single-spaced handout that includes a small image of your painting
in color, an outline of
the ideas from your presentation, and a bibliography of the sources you used. It should look something like
this.
The Images
These images are hyperlinked to the Artstor
database the College subscribes to--these are the best available online
resources. We'll use the course calendar to organize who does what
painting, when.
Turner, J. M. W. (Joseph Mallord William)
1775-1851 |
|
Constable, John
1776-1837 |
|
Landseer, Edwin Henry,
1803-1873 |
|
Redgrave, Richard
1804-1888 |
|
Dadd, Richard
1817-1886 |
|
Brown, Ford Madox
1821-1893 |
|
Hunt, William Holman
1827-1910 |
|
Millais, John Everett
1827-1910 |
|
Rossetti, Dante Gabriel
1828-1882 |
|
Siddal, Elizabeth
1832-1864 |
|
Burne-Jones, Edward
1833-1898 |
|
Morris, William
1834-1896 |
|
Whistler, James Abbot McNeil
1834-1903 |
|
Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema
1836 - 1912 |
|
Clausen, George
1852-1944 |
|
Library Resources
I have placed a
number of books on reserve in the library. You should also search
the card catalog under the words preraphaelitism, pre-raphaelitism, and
pre-raphaelites.
The library subscribes to
Art Abstracts as well, and this resource might point you in the
direction of some useful articles on individual works of art. I
would also recommend searching appropriate databases under the libraries
Art &
Humanities databases (Academic
Search Premier,
Arts & Humanities Search,
JSTOR,
Literature Online (LION),
MLA International Bibliography,
Periodical Abstracts, and
Wilson Select Plus might all be worth checking)
. Also,
don't forget to search the
card catalog
for books about your artist--these will often contain sections analyzing
individual paintings.
Evaluation Criteria
Your presentation/discussion will be evaluated based on the following
criteria:
- Presentation of the painting (could we actually see it? did the
presenter practice with the presentation software?)
- Knowledge of the painting (mastery of the painting, familiarity with
its elements, ability to answer questions, connections to Victorian
culture)
- Structure of the presentation/discussion (effective management of
the discussion with questions, transitions, follow-up, and fill in)
- Energy/enthusiasm (generation of interest, intellectual excitement,
curiosity about your painting)
- Quality of the handout (well-written, polished, substantive)
|