|
|
|
CATA
Professional Portfolio Evaluation Procedures
CATA Class
of 2009 Portfolio Mentors &
Evaluators
Evaluation Procedures:
-
By the end of November 2006 (or earlier as determined), each student
CATA major will be expected to obtain a review of his/her portfolio with
his/her CATA faculty mentor.
Take his/her advice!!
-
By
Monday,
January 28, 2008, each senior portfolio
must be ready for evaluation by
two CATA faculty members. The evaluation will be guided by the CATA portfolio rubrics for the
appropriate concentration and will use a 4 point scale.
Links to the evaluation rubrics are found below. Use those
evaluation criteria as you write and edit your reflection
statements.
-
Evaluation will NOT involve "re-grading" artifacts but will, rather,
focus primarily on the students' understanding of how goals have been
met and demonstrated in the artifacts as revealed in reflection
statements.
-
Once
each faculty evaluator has scored each goal (i.e. I.A, II.C, etc..) for
a portfolio, the two evaluators will meet to discuss their scores and
reach a "consensus" score for each goal. These scores will determine the
portfolio grade and will be recorded for assessment purposes. The
evaluators will also prepare comments to accompany the scores as
feedback to the student.
-
An
acceptable portfolio will achieve a 3.0 or better average score on each
major goal category (i.e. I, II, III, IV and IV) and no more than one
score less than 2.0 on any specific goal (e.g. I.C.) in each category.
-
Results
of portfolio evaluations will be available to students by February
25 or
before. Should a student's portfolio receive less than a passing
score, that student will have
until March 3 to make revisions and
correct deficiencies at which time the evaluators will review the
portfolio for a second time.
Normally the department will not
review a portfolio more than twice in a single semester.
Students who do not pass
the portfolio on the second attempt can expect to register for and
repeat CATA 421 at a later time.
Evaluation Rubrics
|